The
Relationship between Quran and Science
Written by AbuIsmaeel
Aslam Hussain
Note: The
second last paragraph of this article has been revised & altered
from the initial article; Revised in early 2004
An interesting issue has
been raised. Some Muslim scholars of Tafsir in the past did
speculate that the earth is flat and not spherical. Yet the Quran
does not postulate that. This leads to a discussion of the role of
the Quran. No doubt it is primarily a divine book of guidance from
the Creator to Jinn and Man to draw a step closer to the pleasure of
Allah through His Worship by leading a balanced life in every walk of
life. But, in the field of Science and technology, is the Quran
intended to be its text book, and if not, then, why not?
Furthermore, an exploration of this issue leads to a few amazing
realities of the fact that the Quran is indeed the unadulterated Word
of God.
Bismillahi-Rahmani-Rahim
Wa bihi nasta'een
In the name of God, Most
Merciful, Most Beneficient; and from Him we seek help.
All Praise is for the One
and only God Who created all that we see around us so perfectly, with
immense knowledge, deep insight and unparalleled mastery. The more
one discovers these the more he appreciates. Likewise, all Praise is
for the One and Only God who sent Messengers and Books of Guidance to
His Creation from time to time. He sent the Quran, the last of them,
and perfected it with guidance based on His immense knowledge, deep
insight and unparalleled wisdom in its guidance and eloquence. The
more we increase in wisdom the more we appreciate it.
What is the relationship
of Quran to Science and Technology? Did Muslim scholars of Quran and
Islam believe the earth was flat?
The answer unashamedly
is, 'Yes, they did'. The Quran merely described the earth as a vast
expanse stretched out for all to live stably and comfortably on it.
Some scholars extrapolated from it that the earth was a flat sheet
(as opposed to a sphere). But herein lays a further proof that the
Quran is the word of God and not of any man, as we will see shortly
inshaAllah.
First we will examine the
relationship of Quran to Science and Technology. From this the place
of the abovementioned saying of some Muslim scholars will become
clear.
Allah refers to the Quran
as containing arguments that serve as eye openers to the reality of
this life, the knowledge of its Creator, His Messenger and purpose of
life. He says therein, (the translation of it means) "This
(contains) Basaa'ir (deep insights, arguments and eye openers) for
mankind." [Sura Jaathiya45: 20] He also says, "O
people, there has indeed come to you an admonition from your Lord, a
healing for what is in the chests; and a guidance and mercy for the
Believers." [Sura Yunus10: 57] So the Quran serves as an
admonition persuading the people and appealing to their better
judgment to cure and heal the unhealthy thoughts, feelings and
beliefs that they may harbour in their chests about life, toward
their Creator and fellow human beings. Moreover, it provides guidance
in every walk of life to lift their character and reap the benefits
as a mercy for those who believe in it and follow its guidance.
So the Quran is a book of
guidance to open people's eyes to the reality of this life, its
Creator and to live in harmony with His creation. In other words the
Quran and the Messenger of God, who conveyed the Book to us from our
Creator, said about the whole purpose behind his being sent as a
Messenger with the Quran, "Verily, I have merely been sent
to complete the noble characteristics." (Innama bu'ithtu
li utammima makaarimal-aklaaq). As the Scholars have pointed out, the
aklaaq or character in Arabic, 'is the internal make-up of a person
that brings forth actions naturally and without any difficulty.' Thus
the Quran and the Messenger have been sent to complete and perfect
our character; firstly in our relationship with our Creator and then
in our dealings with our fellow human beings as well as animals and
the inanimate objects created by God.
This, the Quran sets out
to do as did the Messenger of our Creator, Muhammad (s.a.w), in his
life time and for after his death left behind for us his Hadith (a
record of his sayings and actions); and they both fulfilled their
task in an impeccable manner. With this, it starts to become clearer
that the Quran is not and was not meant to be a textbook on science
and technology. Nowhere in it does it claim this, nor did the
Messenger of God, Muhammad. It did not even set out to make one
scientific theory or serve as a manual for a technological
breakthrough. Science and technology are merely a means to the end
that the Quran came to guide us to. The knowledge of science and
technology are a common human heritage and aspects of them are
constantly revised, discarded or developed. Something we believe to
be true today may be disproved a few years later. An example of that
is the age of the earth. The Medieval Christians (during their 'Dark
Ages' specified it within a certain range. Scientists at the onset of
Christian European Renaissance revised that figure using more
developed means to determine its age and increased the number by more
than ten times. Then the scientists with the advancement of
technology used radioactive means and determined its age to be far
higher in the order of millions of years. They realized that the
earlier thermal means were in fact incorrect due to climatic
influences on the thermal mode of assessment! This is an example of
what was once believed to be scientific facts being proven wrong and
revised with more technological advancement.
Our knowledge of science
is based on experimental method and extrapolating a theory of the
'reality' and this is coloured by the philosophical beliefs of the
scientists who are postulating that theory. A lot of what many call
science is facts explained by the scientist's beliefs and philosophy.
However, since technology
is concerned with the means and not the end, the Quran -which is the
exact word of God - makes no direct attempt at raising the level of
man in it and that is a steady ongoing process. It merely encourages
them to use it for good.
But, as for the Prophet
Muhammad whose words (recorded in Hadith collection) were human and
not divine, he never even attempted to postulate a scientific theory
as that was not his mission. The most he ever referred to scientific
concepts was no more than as passing references while making another
religious point in the broad sense. His knowledge of technology and
science (as with his companions who were all humans and not divine,
it) was to a large extent a reflection of the scientific awareness of
the people of that time -but without the superstitious beliefs which
Islam purified them from. As for the knowledge of religious guidance
that the Prophet was sent with, it was of divine accuracy since it
was revealed to him from God. As Muslim scholars pointed out, if ever
the Prophet exercised his judgment (ijtihad) in verdicts to do with
matters of religious guidance (be it in economics, politics or social
life), then Allah ensured that his judgment was never left unchecked
if he ever erred as a human (as pointed out in books of Usool-ul-Fiqh
and Tafseer).
We see a clear example of
the nature of the knowledge of the Prophet in the two fields from the
following incident and he himself makes the point very clearly.
The Prophet (May the
peace and blessings of Allah be on him) along with some of his
companions migrated from Mecca to Medina. The Meccans were merchants
and traders while the Medinians were people of agriculture. One day,
in Medina, the Prophet was passing by a few Medinan farmers who were
climbing high up on date palms to enhance pollination of seeds. They
would manually put male with the female instead of leaving it to the
wind to do it. The Prophet, who was not a farmer without realizing
the importance of this manual process said to them, "Perhaps
it may be better for you not to do this." The Medinians,
hearing this from the Messenger of God left what they were doing. The
produce came out scarcely as it was merely by the wind. The Prophet
clarified his role and nature as a Messenger of God to the people in
very clear terms, "If I order you to do something that is
to do with your religion then take it (and do it) but if I order you
to do something from my own opinion then verily I am merely a human
being;" and he added, "You are more
knowledgeable of the matters of your world." This is an
authentic hadith, collected in Sahih Muslim.
Thus we see in the hadith
literature when the Prophet and the companions happened to mention
anything of scientific nature, as the Prophet pointed out earlier, it
reflects their contemporary human level of knowledge in those matters
of technology. Yet when we see in the Quran any passing references
made to a matter of science, it is of timeless accuracy - some of
those facts that have only been discovered thirteen hundred years
later with modern advanced scientific equipment. An example of this
is references to embryological stages of development discovered
recently by microscopes.
Doesn't this clearly show
that the author of the Quran was not a contemporary to the time of
its Revelation - not the Prophet nor any human being - rather the
author was someone with knowledge of timeless accuracy?
I mentioned that the
Quran makes no more than 'passing references' to matters of science
as the Quran was not meant to be a text book teaching science nor did
it concern itself with that. The role of these passing references
whenever made in a moral lesson can be understood by the following
example.
Imagine when you see a
person being extremely haughty and arrogant, you rebuke him saying,
"Why are you behaving so arrogantly while you were made from
just two tiny cells, the sperm and the ovum in a tiny droplet of
liquid that no one even likes to touch!" You are imparting a
moral lesson and making passing references only to scientific facts
to make the moral point and no more. In fact had Allah used
scientific concepts that could not have been understood at all at
that point in time or thereafter, then the point would not have been
understood and the people would have been left confused. That is why
the only references are of a nature such that the moral lesson can
still be made. It is these that even leading non-Muslim scientists
have discovered in the Quran.
Keith Moore is a leading
Canadian Embryologist and two of his books have been used as
Embryology text books in Medical faculties at universities around the
world. He is an example of one who researched into these scientific
references in the Quran and realized that the author of the Quran is
One Whose knowledge is of timeless accuracy and not a human being. He
accepted Islam and became a Muslim. He even published the third
addition of one of these text books with correlations between Quran
and embryological facts. However, the publishers soon brought out a
fourth edition and left only a paragraph of that in the section on
history! Just as the leading magicians in the Court of Pharaoh
realized that the staff of Moses was no magic but from a non human,
super natural source, God; likewise these scientists who were humble,
open-minded and without any vested interests, they realized that the
scientific facts made references to in the Quran are not from a human
from the time of revelation but rather from God Whose knowledge is
eternal and complete.
Sheikh Muhammad ibn Salih
al-Utheimeen, a leading scholar of Islam who died only a few years
ago, made a very interesting point that shows the difference between
Islam, and other religions. He said, (from what I relate from memory)
"From the apparent (Dh-aahir) understanding of the verses of the
Quran I understand that the sun goes around the earth - at least from
our reference point here on earth. If knowledge comes to us with
certainty that it in fact is the opposite, then I would realise that
these verses were merely pointing out the movement of the sun as seen
by an onlooker on earth (as the moral lesson is being made about them
sitting in the cave on earth with the sun above them as in Sura
Kahf). Both concepts can be understood from those verses in
isolation." In fact those expressions are along the lines of
what we still say today in our expressions and fully understand what
we mean when we say 'Sunrise, sun has risen or the sun has set!' The
Sheikh did not concern himself with these matters. As for the moral
and spiritual development (in all walks of life including economics,
political, social interactions etc), this sheikh like others, learnt
it from the Quran which is what the Quran was sent for, and his
knowledge and excellence in these aspects was proverbial.
Had the Quran been sent
by God for teaching science instead of moral development it would
have done it with the same class and expertise.
Yet, as the Quran points
out, many among mankind do not accept and submit to God's guidance.
At times it is because of racial pride and arrogance while with
others it is simply indulgence in the temporal pleasures of this life
to an extent where they do not contemplate enough and are not willing
to give up these immediate pleasures for the eternal ones that they
cannot see even if they knew and realised.
Moreover, had the Quran
been from a human or any other than God there would have been
internal inconsistencies and discrepancies - as is characteristic of
a mortal in his authorship - but the Quran is amazingly coherent and
there is not even a single contradiction neither within itself nor
with proven facts outside it. Allah said in the Quran, (the
translation reads) "Do they not then reflect on the Quran,
had it been from any other than God, they would have found therein
many discrepancies" [Sura Nisa 4:82]
It is an individual’s
shortcoming for not accepting the Quran despite its truth being so
manifest. It even challenged them to produce a short chapter like it
in its eloquence, lofty guidance with penetrating insight and wisdom.
This challenge is very appropriate as a human can match the work of
another or even surpass it; but not one that is from God, Man’s
Creator. The Quran was revealed at a Golden Era in history of Arabic
language. Works of poetic mastery captivated the tribes across the
Arabian deserts; the best were inscribed in Gold and hung on Kaba in
Mecca for local and international pilgrims to marvel. To bring home
a point, God, having revealed the Quran in this Era, challenged the
masters then or in future to parallel it if it could be conceived to
be from a human like them. None came forth in over fourteen
centuries. Some of Shakespeare’s work is debated in literary
circles whether it is his or of someone else due to a difference
despite the closeness in literary style and quality. This shows
another human could parallel his human effort. As for Quran, no
being to this day has even approached its quality! Even Orientalists
such as Nicholson conceded that Quran is unique in its excellence and
unsurpassed over the history! The difference between the
craftsmanship of a created being and the work of the Creator is clear
- in the natural world all around us; and in the Quran.
Our Creator says in
Quran, His Book of Guidance sent for us, He says about this book
itself, "Alif, Lam, Mim, That is the Book there is no
doubt in it is a guidance for the God-conscious." [Sura
Baqarah 2:1-2]
"So whoever hopes for the Meeting with his
Lord, let him work righteousness and associate none as a partner in the
worship of his Lord."
(18:110)
|